For the past two weeks, much of our
nation's attention has been focused on the U.S. athletes competing in the
2004 Summer Olympic Games in Athens. Yet few of us know, or would even
care, that our nation sent another elite group of U.S. competitors to
Athens last month for the 2004 International Mathematics Olympiad.
Granted, an Olympiad for math may not be as exciting as Michael Phelps'
quest for eight Olympic swimming medals or Marion Jones' attempt to win
gold in the long jump. But the fact is, the ability of our youth to
compete with the rest of the world in mathematics, or at least to be
functionally literate in the subject, is infinitely more important for our
economic and technological future than our nation's haul of Olympic gold,
silver and bronze medals.
The reason is that mathematics is the language of science. And without
math and science, our progress in science and technology – the economic
engine of our nation and state – would be seriously compromised. The
problem for the United States is that while our scientific and
technological enterprise is the envy of the world, the performance of our
middle and high school students in mathematics is not.
Although our educational system has produced some top flight students
of mathematics – such as Alison Miller from Niskayuna, N.Y., the second
female ever to qualify for a U.S. Math Olympiad team – our 12th-graders
scored better in the last international examination that compared
mathematical achievement among high school students in 21 countries than
their peers in only two countries – Cyprus and South Africa. Austria,
Slovenia, Russia, Lithuania and the Czech Republic were some of the
countries that outperformed our students on that test.
Our eighth-graders did better in a more recent international
comparison, in 1999, but theirs was hardly a gold medal performance,
coming in 19th out of 38 countries. The countries that outscored us
included Slovenia, Czech Republic, Malaysia, Bulgaria and Latvia. A
separate comparison among eighth-graders from 40 states, conducted in
2000, ranked California 36th in mathematics performance and in last place,
tied with Hawaii, in science performance.
These are worrisome trends for a state dependent on science and
technology for its economic future.
The encouraging thing is our students are improving, especially closer
to home. Earlier this month, results from the California Standards Test
showed that 43 percent of San Diego County's students in grades two to
eight met the state's definition of proficiency in mathematics, an
increase from 38 percent two years ago. And 74 percent of the 10th-graders
in San Diego city schools passed the mathematics portion of the California
High School Exit Exam, the test that they will be required to pass to
obtain their diplomas in 2006, an increase from the 61 percent who passed
the last time it was administered in 2001.
We're headed in the right direction, but like Olympic development
coaches, we need to do more to assure that our next generation is
competitive with the rest of the world and at least minimally proficient
in mathematics. Earlier this year, the state Board of Education granted
waivers to school districts up and down California, including a number in
San Diego County, from a state law requiring that their high school
graduates complete a course in algebra. As a result, some 13,000 students,
including 600 in San Diego County, received high school diplomas this
spring without this basic mathematical skill. That's not the way to build
a winning Team USA.
While the United States remains the undisputed leader in science and
technology, we can't rest on our laurels. As is the case in many Olympic
events in which U.S. athletes were once dominant, the rest of the world is
quickly catching up. A study conducted this year by the National Science
Foundation found that while U.S. scientists continue to publish the lion's
share of scientific papers, the growth in the number of papers from other
parts of the world from 1998 to 2001, particularly Western Europe and
Asia, was three times as great as the growth from U.S. scientists.
If the same kind of attention and concern could be focused on boosting
mathematics achievement as was focused on the U.S. Olympic basketball team
following its losses to Puerto Rico and Lithuania, perhaps our economic
future might be more secure.
If our country's greatest mathematicians and mathematical educators
were regarded, like our Olympic athletes, as national heroes, perhaps we
could rekindle the national pride that our country had for its
mathematicians, scientists and engineers during the post-Sputnik era, when
we raced the Soviet Union to put the first men on the moon.
Few San Diegans know that one of the world's greatest mathematicians –
Efim Zelmanov, a professor of mathematics here at the University of
California San Diego – lives within their midst. Or that he won the 1994
Fields Medal, commonly referred to as the Nobel Prize for mathematicians,
which, like Olympic gold medals, are awarded every four years in a
different venue around the world.
Hungarian-born mathematician Paul Erdos, a genius who published more
than 1,500 papers, is another mathematical giant with ties to San Diego.
His work in probabilistic combinatorics pioneered the way for major
advancements in computer science, coding theory and the development of
communications networks. While Erdos, who died in 1996, spent most of his
life traveling between universities and collaborating mathematicians, his
only real home was a room in the house of mathematicians Ronald Graham and
Fan Chung Graham, now faculty members in UCSD's mathematics and computer
science departments.
These modest and introspective geniuses would never consider themselves
– and probably would never want to be considered – national heroes. But
their intellectual contributions will have far greater consequences to our
society and our nation's economic progress than the number of Olympic
medals that U.S. athletes will bring home from Athens this month.