Midterm #1 Solutions
Professor Gross
Spring 2006
- Let
Compute:
-
.
-
.
-
, where
is the angle between
and
.
-
.
- Give a parametric equation for the line passing through the two points
- We may use the formula
, where
is the initial point and
is the final point. This will give us:
so our parametric equations are:
- Another method is to use
as the initial point and use
as the direction vector for the line:
So we get the vector equation
, which again gives the parametric equations
- Find a parametric equation for the line which is the intersection of the planes

and
- Method 1
The above picture shows the two planes we are considering. We will call the planes
and
. Specifically,
and
We will use
to represent the line formed by the intersection, and we will say that
is the direction vector of
. Now,
lies in
, so if
is a normal vector to
, then
and
are orthogonal. Similarly,
, a normal vector of
will be orthogonal to
. This means that if we know
and
, then we can find a vector for
.
Now, just by looking at the coefficients, we can see that
and
. Now we want
to be orthogonal to both of these vectors, so we will take the cross product and get:
So we have a direction vector. Now, to have the equation for a line, we also need an initial point, which means that we need to find a point on the line
. To find that point, notice that we can choose any value for
and we will be able to find a
and
to satisfy the equations. So, we will just set
and find what
and
are when
. But
gives us
from the first equation, so
, Plugging this in to the equation for the second plane, we get
, but since we had
, we get that
, so that means that the point
is on the line
, which can be verified by plugging it in to the equations of the planes. Now, we have a point on the line and a direction vector for the line, so we can write a vector equation for the line
:
and changing this in to a parametric equation, we get
or slightly simplified,
- Method 2:
This is another method, but it seemed to be one which was prone to errors and misinterpretation, for which reason I suggest the previous method. The previous method is also easier to understand, I think; this method is more one of pushing symbols around until an answer falls out:
We will start with the equations for the planes:
 |
(1) |
 |
(2) |
and from (
), we get
 |
(3) |
which yields
when plugged in to (
). Simplifying, we get
If we plug this in to (
), we get
Now that we have everything in terms of
, we can set
and get
- Give Cartesian coordinates for the point whose cylindrical coordinates are
We know the following relations:
So:
Thus in Cartesian coordinates, the point is
.
- Give Cartesian coordinates for the point whose spherical coordinates are
We know the following relations:
So:
Thus in Cartesian coordinates, the point is
.
- Sketch the surface whose equation in spherical coordinates
is given by
Since there are no restriction on
or
, we can look at any points for which
. That is going to be any point on the cone shown below:
- Find a vector orthogonal to the plane containing the points
,
, and
with
- Find the area of the triangle
.
The area of the shape above is equal to the magnitude of the cross product
. This means that the area of the triangle is one half of that:
- Compute
where
so
In the yellow version's problem 1(c), there is an error.
should be changed to
. As it is written, there is no solution becuase
. If you assumed that you could have
, you should get the same answer as in the green version.
In the yellow version's problem 4(b), the dot product is zero. So, in 4(c), you will get that
, however you should mention, or show that
, that is
and
. Otherwise,
is not defined.
Midterm #1 Solutions
This document was generated using the
LaTeX2HTML translator Version 2002-2-1 (1.70)
Copyright © 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996,
Nikos Drakos,
Computer Based Learning Unit, University of Leeds.
Copyright © 1997, 1998, 1999,
Ross Moore,
Mathematics Department, Macquarie University, Sydney.
The command line arguments were:
latex2html -split 0 20C_Gross_MT1.tex
The translation was initiated by Dan McAllaster on 2006-05-02
Dan McAllaster
2006-05-02