Daniel P. McAllaster1
Let
be a noncommutative polynomial. Define
to be the Laplacian of
. Then,
That is to say: if we replace
by
and
by
in original function, we simply do the same in the
Laplacian.Therefore, if the Laplacian of
is zero, then the Laplacian of
is also zero. Therefore, if we have a function which is harmonic, we can sometimes generate another harmonic function by performing this change of variables. As an observation, the polynomials above which are of odd degree seem to be such that if we know one of them, the other is obtained by performing this transformation, whereas the polynomials of even degree, when subjected to this transformation will yield the same polynomial we started with, except for a possible multiplication by
.
NCHarmonic1[deg_]:=NCHarmonic1[deg]=NCE[((-1)^deg)x**NCHarmonic1[deg-1]+y**NCHarmonic2[deg-1]]; NCHarmonic2[deg_]:=NCHarmonic2[deg]=NCE[((-1)^(deg+1))x**NCHarmonic2[deg-1]+y**NCHarmonic1[deg-1]]; NCHarmonic1[3]=x**x**y+x**y**x+y**x**x-y**y**y; NCHarmonic2[3]=x**x**x-x**y**y-y**x**y-y**y**x;
Mathematically speaking, we may define
The proof is a follows:
It is a simple matter to verify that
and
are harmonic and that
and
. Now, suppose that we know
and
are harmonic, and that
and
.
Then given any
,
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
Thus, we can find the Laplacian of
and
in a fairly simple manner:
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
Summing, we get
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
| 0 |
Hence
is harmonic. Now, for
:
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
Summing, we get
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
| 0 |
Finally, we must show that
and
. We have already calculated the first derivatives, so the results will follow quite easily:
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
Therefore, we have shown inductively that the recursion will produce harmonic
polynomials of any degree larger than two. We have further shown that these polynomials are distinct because if they are not distinct, or one is a constant multiple of the other for some
, we can write
for some
, so we then have that
and
and
but clearly
, so
, which can not happen because no coefficients in our polynomials are complex.
Now, suppose that we are given a function
which is harmonic, homogeneous, and of degree
. Then, every monomial of
begins with either
or
, so we may uniquely represent
as
, and in the manner shown above, we find that
and since
is harmonic, this gives:
, or:
Now, since all terms on the right hand side begin with an
, and all of the terms on the left hand side start with an
or
, it must be that both sides are zero, which means that
![]() |
so that means that
Now, in the case of degree three, there are exactly two linearly independent harmonic polynomials, which have been given above. The proof that there are exactly two is as follows:
Every homogeneous polynomial of degree three has the form
| 0 | |||
| 0 | |||
| 0 | |||
| 0 | |||
| 0 | |||
This amounts having the vector
in the nullspace of the matrix
which has the basis
, corresponding to polynomials
and
. Hence there are exactly two linearly independent harmonic polynomials which are homogeneous of degree three.
Now suppose that for degree
, we know that there are only two linearly independent polynomials which are harmonic and homogeneous, then for degree
, suppose that in addition to
and
, we also know that
is linearly independent of
and
and is harmonic. Then
where
and
are both harmonic, and homogeneous of degree
. Then
but from equation (2), we know that we must have
which is equivalent to saying that
Now, by applying the identities for
and
given in equation (1), we can get the following:
means that
which is, of course, a contradiction, because it says that
is linearly dependent upon
and
. Hence no such
can exist, so the recursion given produces all harmonic polynomials in two variables.
The method originally used to find all homogeneous harmonic polynomials was relatively straightforward, but is included here because it may not be totally obvious, and could be useful for other investigations similar to the one in this paper.
The first step is to write out the polynomial with all monomials of the desired degree. This was accomplished in my case by using a small Mathematica routine written by John Shopple, which also puts a constant term in front of each monomial. After this, the polynomial has the desired operator (in our case, the Laplacian) applied to it, which leaves us with a polynomial with an extra letter, such as `
', which is the direction of differentiation. We then group like monomials in this new polynomial, such that each monomial has a coefficient which is a sum of one or more of the original coefficients, and since in our case, we desired a Laplacian of zero, we then set each sum to zero, and solve the system which this yields.
After having found the harmonic polynomials, and especially after having found that there seem to be only two linearly independent ones for each degree (I used the method outlined above to find the polynomials to about degree eight, at which time computation became rather time consuming), I then studied them and was able to find a recursion relation to generate the polynomials, and finally came up with the rather straightforward proof given. Some time later, I was able to prove the uniqueness.
The following discovery was made by Bill Helton.
Now,
, so
, so suppose that
Hence the polynomials generated by taking the real and imaginary parts of the powers of
are constant multiples of the harmonic polynomials generated by the recursion and are, therefore harmonic.
The following table shows the number of linearly independent harmonic polynomials which are homogeneous of a given degree:
| Degree | # of harmonic polynomials |
| 2 | 8 |
| 3 | 18 |
| 4 | 30 |
| 5 | 47 |
| 6 | 68 |
| 7 | 93 |
| 8 | 122 |
For four variables, we have even fewer results, and have not yet found a general pattern. It is quite time consuming to even find the number of linearly independent harmonic polynomials for degree larger that about six. The following is the data we know:
| Degree | # of harmonic polynomials |
| 2 | 15 |
| 3 | 52 |
| 4 | 163 |
| 5 | 444 |
| 6 | 1097 |
We are working on obtaining more data, in hopes of finding a pattern.
This document was generated using the LaTeX2HTML translator Version 2002-2-1 (1.70)
Copyright © 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996,
Nikos Drakos,
Computer Based Learning Unit, University of Leeds.
Copyright © 1997, 1998, 1999,
Ross Moore,
Mathematics Department, Macquarie University, Sydney.
The command line arguments were:
latex2html -split=0 harmonic.tex
The translation was initiated by Dan McAllaster on 2004-08-26