Fri, Apr 19 2024
  • 1:00 pm
    Hugo Jenkins - UCSD
    No Prerequisites Cayley-Bacharach

    Food for Thought

    AP&M 6402

    The Cayley-Bacharach theorem says that if two plane cubics intersect in exactly 9 points, then any third cubic passing through eight of these must pass through the ninth. We'll give a weird, elementary but cute proof which shows something a tiny bit stronger. The prerequisites will be not nil but nilpotent, limited to Bezout's theorem which I'll state carefully in the form I need. This proof came from Math 262A, which apparently got it from Terence Tao's blog.

Mon, Apr 22 2024
  • 4:00 pm
    Runqiu Xu - UCSD
    A Comparison of U(N) and SU(N) Weingarten functions

    Advancement

    APM 6402 & via zoom:  https://ucsd.zoom.us/j/96668973079

    U(N) Weingarten function, known in computing the U(N) link integral, is an essential ingredient in physics. Although fewer people pay attention to SU(N), the SU(N) Weingarten function is important in the lattice gauge theory and it differs from U(N) . In this talk, I will present the derivation of the SU(N) Weingarten function using character theory and emphasize some details about how it differs from the perspective of polynomial representation of $GL_N$. We will also explore the nice combinatorial interpretation of the 1/N expansion of the Weingarten function using Hurwitz-Cayley graph which serves as the Feynman diagram

Tue, Apr 23 2024
  • 11:00 am
    Jesse Peterson - Vanderbilt University
    Biexact von Neumann algebras

    Functional Analysis Seminar (Math 243)

    APM 7218

    The notion of biexactness for groups was introduced by Ozawa in 2004 and has since become a major tool used for studying solidity of von Neumann algebras. In joint work with Changying Ding, we extended this notion from the group theory setting to the setting of von Neumann algebras, thereby giving a unified setting for proving solidity type results. We will discuss biexactness and solidity and give examples of solid von Neumann algebras that are not biexact.  

  • 11:00 am
    Haoyu Zhang - UCSD
    An interacting particle consensus method for constrained global optimization

    Math 278A - Center for Computational Mathematics Seminar

    APM 2402 and Zoom ID 982 8500 1195

    This talk presents a particle-based optimization method designed for addressing minimization problems with equality constraints, particularly in cases where the loss function exhibits non-differentiability or non-convexity. A rigorous mean-field limit of the particle system is derived, and the convergence of the mean-field limit to the constrained minimizer is established.

  • 2:00 pm
    Colleen Robichaux - UCLA
    Exploring Kohnert’s rule for Grothendieck polynomials

    Combinatorics Seminar (Math 269)

    APM 7321

    A 2015 conjecture of Ross and Yong proposes a K-Kohnert rule for Grothendieck polynomials. In this talk we discuss the utility of Kohnert rules then prove a special case of the Ross-Yong conjecture. We then show the conjecture fails in general.

Thu, Apr 25 2024
  • 11:00 am
    Prof. Konstantinos Panagiotou - LMU Munich
    Limit Laws for Critical Dispersion on Complete Graphs

    Math 288 - Probability & Statistics

    AP&M 6402 (Zoom-Talk)

    We consider a synchronous process of particles moving on the vertices of a graph $G$, introduced by Cooper, McDowell, Radzik, Rivera and Shiraga (2018). Initially, $M$ particles are placed on a vertex of $G$. In subsequent time steps, all particles that are located on a vertex inhabited by at least two particles jump independently to a neighbour chosen uniformly at random. The process ends at the first step when no vertex is inhabited by more than one particle; we call this (random) time step the dispersion time.

    In this work we study the case where $G$ is the complete graph on $n$ vertices and the number of particles is $M=n/2+\alpha n^{1/2} + o(n^{1/2})$, $\alpha\in \mathbb{R}$.This choice of $M$ corresponds to the critical window of the process, with respect to the dispersion time.

    We show that the dispersion time, if rescaled by $n^{-1/2}$, converges in $p$-th mean, as $n\rightarrow \infty$ and for any $p \in \mathbb{R}$, to a continuous and almost surely positive random variable $T_\alpha$.

    We find that $T_\alpha$ is the absorption time of a standard logistic branching process, thoroughly investigated by Lambert (2005), and we determine its expectation. In particular, in the middle of the critical window we show that $\mathbb{E}[T_0] = \pi^{3/2}/\sqrt{7}$, and furthermore we formulate explicit asymptotics when~$|\alpha|$ gets large that quantify the transition into and out of the critical window. We also study the random variable counting the \emph{total number of jumps} that are performed by the particles until the dispersion time is reached and prove that, if rescaled by $n\ln n$, it converges to $2/7$ in probability.

    Based on joint work with Umberto De Ambroggio, Tamás Makai, and Annika Steibel; see arXiv:2403.05372

Mon, Apr 29 2024
  • 3:00 pm
    Professor Tsachik Gelander - Northwestern University
    Spectral gap for irreducible subgroups and a strong version of Margulis normal subgroup theorem.

    Math 211A - Algebra Seminar

    APM 7321

    Let \(\Gamma\) be a discrete group. A subgroup \(N\) is called confined if there is a finite set \(F\) in \(\Gamma\) which intersects every conjugate of \(N\) outside the trivial element. For example, a nontrivial normal subgroup is confined. 

    A discrete subgroup of a semisimple Lie group is confined if the corresponding locally symmetric orbifold has bounded injectivity radius. We proved a generalization of the celebrated NST:  Let \(\Gamma\) be an irreducible lattice in a higher rank semisimple Lie group G. Let \(N<\Gamma\) be a confined subgroup. Then \(N\) is of finite index. 
                            
    The case where \(G\) has Kazhdan's property (T) was established in my joint work with Mikolaj Frakzyc. As in the original NST, without property (T) the problem is considerably harder. The main part is to prove a spectral gap for \(L_2(G/N)\). 
                            
    This is a joint work with Uri Bader and Arie Levit.
     

Tue, May 7 2024
  • 4:00 pm
    Víctor Rivero - Center of Research in Mathematics, Guanajuato, Mexico
    An excursion from self-similar Markov processes to Markov additive processes

    2024 Ronald K. Getoor Distinguished Lecture

    AP&M 6402

    In stochastic modeling we often need to deal with one of two apparently unrelated objects. One is self-similar processes and the other is additive functionals. Self-similar Markov processes are the class of Markovian models that arise as scaling limits of stochastic processes, that are obtained after renormalization of time and space. Additive functionals arise commonly when one considers, for instance, rewards associated to a Markovian model. 

    On the one hand, the so-called Lamperti transform ensures that any $R^d$-valued self-similar Markov process admits a polar decomposition, and the argument and the radius of the process are related to a Markov additive process via an explicit time change. On the other hand, any additive functional A of a Markov process X is such that the pair (A, X) is a Markov additive process. A Markov additive process (MAP) is a stochastic process with two components: one that is additive, and real valued, the ordinator, and a general one, the modulator, that rules the behavior of the ordinator. The ordinator has independent and stationary increments, given the modulator. This general structure emulates the structure of processes with independent and stationary increments, Levy processes, as for instance Brownian motion, Cauchy and stable processes, Gamma processes, etc. 

    In general, it is too ambitious to try to determine explicitly the whole law of a self-similar Markov process or of an additive functional. But we can aim at understanding properties of the extremes of these processes and to be ready for the best and worst scenarios. In the fluctuation theory of Markov additive processes we aim at developing tools for studying the extremes of the additive part, ordinator, of the process. This has been done in a systematic way during the last four decades under the assumption that the modulator is a constant process, and hence the ordinator is a real valued Levy process. Also, in the 1980-90 period, some foundations were laid to develop a fluctuation theory for MAPs in a general setting.   

    In this talk we aim at giving a brief overview of the fluctuation theory of Markov additive processes, to describe some recent results and to provide some applications to the theory of self-similar Markov processes. These applications are mainly related to stable processes, a class of processes that arises often in mathematical physics, potential and harmonic analysis, and in other areas of mathematics. We aim at making this overview accessible to graduate and advanced undergraduate students, with some knowledge of Markov chains and Levy processes, and to point out at some open research questions.

Tue, May 14 2024
  • 11:00 am
    Aldo Garciaguinto - Michigan State University
    Schreier's Formula for some Free Probability Invariants

    Math 243, Functional Analysis

    APM 7218 and Zoom (meeting ID:  94246284235)

    Let $G\stackrel{\alpha}{\curvearrowright}(M,\tau)$ be a trace-preserving action of a finite group $G$ on a tracial von Neumann algebra. Suppose that $A \subset M$ is a finitely generated unital $*$-subalgebra which is globally invariant under $\alpha$. We give a formula relating the von Neumann dimension of the space of derivations on $A$ valued on its coarse bimodule to the von Neumann dimension of the space of derivations on $A \rtimes^{\text{alg}}_\alpha G$ valued on its coarse bimodule, which is reminiscent of Schreier's formula for finite index subgroups of free groups. This formula induces a formula for $\dim \text{Der}_c(A,\tau)$ (defined by Shlyakhtenko) and under the assumption that $G$ is abelian we obtain the formula for $\Delta$ (defined by Connes and Shlyakhtenko). These quantities and the free entropy dimension quantities agree on a large class of examples, and so by combining these results with known inequalities, one can expand the family of examples for which the quantities agree.

Thu, May 16 2024
  • 4:00 pm
    Paul K. Newton - University of Southern California
    Control of evolutionary mean field games and tumor cell population models

    UCSD Mathematics Colloquium/MathBio Seminar

     Mean field games are played by populations of competing agents who derive their update rules by comparing their own state variable with that of the mean field. After a brief introduction to several areas where they have been used recently, we will focus on models of competing tumor cell populations based on the replicator dynamics mean field evolutionary game with prisoner’s dilemma payoff matrix. We use optimal and adaptive control theory on both deterministic and stochastic versions of these models to design multi-drug chemotherapy schedules that suppress the competitive release of resistant cell populations (to avoid chemo-resistance) by maximizing the Shannon diversity of the competing subpopulations. The models can be extended to networks where spatial connectivity can influence optimal chemotherapy scheduling. 

Mon, May 20 2024
  • 10:45 am
    Ji Zeng
    Variation of no-three-in-line problem

    PhD Defense

    APM 7218

    The famous no-three-in-line problem by Dudeney more than a century ago asks whether one can select 2n points from the grid $[n]^2$ such that no three are collinear. We present two results related to this problem. First, we give a non-trivial upper bound for the maximum size of a set in $[n]^4$ such that no four are coplanar. Second, we characterize the behavior of the maximum size of a subset such that no three are collinear in a random set of $\mathbb{F}_q^2$, that is, the plane over the finite field of order q. We discuss their proofs and related open problems.

Tue, May 21 2024
  • 2:00 pm
    Prof. Michael Molloy - University of Toronto
    The degree-restricted random process is far from uniform

    Math 269 - Combinatorics

    APM 7321

    Suppose you wish to generate a random graph on vertices $v_1, ..., v_n$ where the degree of each $v_i$ is specified to be $d_i$. Perhaps the most natural approach is: Repeatedly  add an edge joining two vertices chosen uniformly from all non-adjacent pairs that are not yet full (i.e. whose current degrees are less than their specified degrees).

    The graph we obtain is not distributed uniformly amongst all graphs with the specified degree sequence (except for some trivial sequences). But is the distribution close to uniform in the sense that every property which holds with high probability in one model holds with high probability in the other?

    We answer that question in the negative for bounded degree sequences that are not regular or close to regular.

    This is joint work with Erlang Surya and Lutz Warnke; see arXiv:2211.00835

Thu, May 23 2024
  • 10:00 am
    Josh Bowman
    TBA

    Math 211B - Group Actions Seminar

    APM 7321 and Zoom ID 967 4109 3409
    (password: dynamics)

Thu, May 30 2024
  • 10:00 am
    Carlos Ospina
    TBA

    Math 211B - Group Actions Seminar

    APM 7321 and Zoom ID 967 4109 3409
    (password: dynamics)